Disclaimer – All mock test materials provided by BL Translations have been crafted using publicly available publications from NAATI, aligning with the appropriate levels and testing components. Copyright for these mock materials is exclusively held by BL Translations. These mock materials are intended solely for educational purposes. Unauthorised commercial use or copying without proper source attribution is strictly prohibited. It is important to note that none of our materials have been recycled or modified from any similar materials owned by other individuals or institutions.
As mentioned in the instructional videos, the NAATI CPI test encompasses various scenarios. Below, you will find sample dialogues to assist candidates in practicing before their NAATI test.
These mock tests adhere to the structure of the NAATI CPI test, enabling you to become more accustomed to its format and pacing. It’s worth noting that the actual test may vary slightly in terms of duration compared to these practice exercises.
Additionally, it’s crucial to keep in mind that during the actual test, your interaction management skills will be evaluated.
While you can request repeats as needed, excessive requests can disrupt the flow of the conversation and are discouraged. It’s important to strike a balance, as too many repeats may hinder your ability to complete the dialogue within the time constraints of the NAATI CPI test.
| Topic: | Legal Defence Talks |
| Field: | Legal |
| Difficulty: | Intermediate |
Transcript
Brief – In this dialogue, Mr. Sanchez, who was apprehended in possession of drugs, discusses his case with his lawyer, Mr. Ian Davis. Their conversation begins now.
Sanchez: Ian, I’ve been going through the transcripts from the Australian Federal Police, and I can’t help but notice that they don’t really show my direct involvement in the drug smuggling operation.
Davis: That’s a valid point, Mr Sanchez. Lack of direct evidence can work in our favour, but we’ve got some hurdles to overcome. Remember, appearances can be deceiving.
Sanchez: Well, I get that, but when I was arrested, they found me with 300 grams of Amphetamines. Isn’t that a problem for our case?
Davis: It’s a tough nut to crack, no doubt. Having that amount of drugs in your possession definitely raises eyebrows. But we’ll need to explore the circumstances surrounding your arrest in more detail.
Sanchez: I also worry about my criminal history. It’s not exactly squeaky clean, and that’s not going to help our case either, is it?
Davis: You’ve got a point there, Mr Sanchez. Your prior convictions do put us at a disadvantage. We’ll need to work on building a solid defence strategy to counteract that.
Sanchez: Do you think we can play the “small fish in a big pond” card? I mean, I wasn’t the mastermind behind this operation. My boss coordinated the shipments coming from Peru and Uruguay. When the shipment arrived at the remote beach in the Northern Territory, he asked us to distribute the drugs. I was just following orders.
Davis: “Playing the small fish” might be an option, but we have to tread carefully. It’s a double-edged sword, as it might imply you were still willingly involved. It was lucky that you were not directly involved in those fishing boat activities, but new evidence served by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions shows forensic traces of methamphetamine were found on the vessel.
Sanchez: Ian, considering my limited involvement in the operation and my cooperation with the authorities during the arrest, do you think we can leverage these factors to build a stronger defence?
Davis: Indeed, Mr. Sanchez, your cooperation can be a significant advantage. However, it’s crucial to recognize the gravity of this offence and the substantial quantity of drugs seized by the police. The other four accused, who had travelled to Australia to oversee the safe landing, storage, and packaging of the drugs for distribution on the black market, received a 12-year jail sentence for aiding and abetting the drug importation, with a mandatory 5-year non-parole period.
Sanchez: How about exploring a plea deal? Could that be a silver lining in all of this?
Davis: A plea deal might be a light at the end of the tunnel. We’ll talk to the prosecution and see if there’s room for negotiation, but it’s not a guarantee.
Sanchez: I just hope we can find a way to turn the tide in my favour. I don’t want to end up behind bars for a long stretch.
Davis: We’ll give it our all, Mr Sanchez. Remember, in legal battles like these, it’s often a marathon, not a sprint. We’ll take it one step at a time.
Sanchez: Thanks, Ian. I appreciate your support and guidance through this rough patch. Let’s give it our best shot.
This is the end of the dialogue.
BL Translations 